Regarding the topic of the article, your rhizomatic pedagogy is super insightful, especially how you tie it to generative models. The idea of basis-relative judgment totaly nails the shift in creative competence. I just wonder if some initial "operator sets" are still kinda fundamental for human learners before full recombination, but your framing is brilliant!
Thank you. I took Chomskyian split, but for (fine) art and apply the "grammar" in the creative activity context. It becomes more complex than language (amodal, institutional layers), thought I believe them to be fundamental if we were to discussion about the learner, learned/created in situ (the longer RGA relativity of generative aesthetics). Maybe the definition could be refined with precision are nuanced layers. Would love to hear which operators sets feel less fundamental than others?
Regarding the topic of the article, your rhizomatic pedagogy is super insightful, especially how you tie it to generative models. The idea of basis-relative judgment totaly nails the shift in creative competence. I just wonder if some initial "operator sets" are still kinda fundamental for human learners before full recombination, but your framing is brilliant!
Thank you. I took Chomskyian split, but for (fine) art and apply the "grammar" in the creative activity context. It becomes more complex than language (amodal, institutional layers), thought I believe them to be fundamental if we were to discussion about the learner, learned/created in situ (the longer RGA relativity of generative aesthetics). Maybe the definition could be refined with precision are nuanced layers. Would love to hear which operators sets feel less fundamental than others?